Supporting student-led learning with data-informed decisions

Silhouette of graduates throwing their caps up in the air against a beautiful sunset sky
© Rawpixelimages

As student-led learning behaviours become more varied, engaging students with a one-size-fits-all approach will no longer be effective in fostering the best learning and belonging

Improving the experiences of students must be made with decisions that are data-informed and encourage cohort identity, whilst keeping student choice at the heart of it all, says Alex Chapman, Head of Technology Enhanced Learning at Middlesex University.

Blended learning has become increasingly prevalent in higher education since the pandemic, as universities continue to deliver education that is flexible and accessible, shifting with the ever-more fragmented landscape of student-led learning behaviours.

A one-size-fits-all approach to student engagement will no longer work

It has become clear that a one-size-fits-all approach to student engagement will no longer work for many students who cannot or do not wish to spend all their time on campus. Therefore, universities must look to data analytics to ensure every student is engaged and satisfied with their course.

Young woman smiling and holding book in university library
© Nd3000

How does demography impact learning?

At Middlesex, our student demographic reflects the wide variety of people now embarking on their studies. Around one-quarter of Middlesex undergraduate UK and EU students come from deprived areas and are also the first generation from their household to enter higher education. Around 45% of our students attend university as the first generation in their family, and 88% of our students fall into at least one of the categories for widening participation. Around four in five of our UK students spend more than 40 minutes travelling to our campus. Consequently, we’ve seen many of our students choose online as an option which fits in with their other commitments, resulting in an increasingly student-led experience. However, as remote learning becomes more frequent, institutions need to be mindful of its impact on student belonging and cohort identity. All these factors must be considered as we move forward with newer teaching delivery models, such as hybrid or blended, and work towards a delivery model where online learning complements on-campus activity.

Data-informed improvements to learning

Our university has been focusing on providing support for students in this blended model of learning as they move through their courses. With the support of student engagement software Solutionpath and its StREAM platform, we have a centralised dashboard to record every student’s engagement, performance, and progress at Middlesex.

For academic tutors, this information is vital to help them identify students potentially at risk of dropping out and give tutors the data to make decisions with the student’s well-being at heart. This data will also play a key role alongside academic advising as we look to integrate aspects of Hybrid and Hyflex learning into the curriculum but continue to ensure students feel the sense of belonging we focus on delivering to students.

Data can also be used to identify different engagement patterns across specific disciplines and cohorts to show how students engage with their programs. Consequently, we can develop tailored answers on best supporting the student based on their course or cohort. Alongside things like student surveys and other formal and informal feedback mechanisms, we can get a holistic oversight of the student experience of our university programs and make improvements where the data indicates it would be beneficial.

Nurturing student-led learning and belonging

A huge part of student engagement and participation is, of course, ingrained in well-being. Data on student satisfaction is not a new concept. Still, with higher education seeing such an acceleration in the use of new technologies, there is an increased risk that students simply don’t feel like they belong in their institution. Cohort identity has been difficult to conjure with the mix of virtual and online spaces, meaning that the discussion around belonging has had to become embedded into the wider conversation of the university experience.

When students first arrive at Middlesex, an onboarding process happens with the Welcome programme; as part of these Welcome activities, students are asked to complete a pre-arrival before meeting with their academic advisor for the first time. The Pre Arrival survey helped academic advisors to understand the make-up of their cohort of tutees and helped to identify specific support requirements with each student receiving an action plan for the following months based on their responses to the survey. Academic Advising plays a key role in supporting students to achieve the best possible outcomes and involves a mixture of group tutorials and one-to-one meetings, including 12 interactions based around the student lifecycle and embedded into the curriculum. This tutorial curriculum will generate rigorous data and student feedback so that any issues are flagged earlier rather than later. The process also allows students to interact and connect with peers and staff members to help them integrate into the learning community.

Letting choice lead the way

As well as being a worthwhile indicator of engagement and well-being, data can also reveal the digital skillset of our students and staff. Many online resources have been introduced only since the pandemic’s beginning; therefore, not all are comfortable or confident with this type of learning. Knowing what digital platforms and in-person approaches work best for different cohorts and disciplines will help to define how we move forward with our teaching and learning strategy.

We know that at Middlesex, we don’t have all the answers. Still, as we move forward with our strategy, we will work with students collaboratively as co-creators to maximise that student experience.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here