Home 2025

Archives

Image: © Cemile Bingol | iStock

Deliberate structural injustice through law

Kati Rantala’s recent article on silent stakeholders addresses the dilemmas in normative inclusive lawmaking that often overlook harsh realities behind the rhetoric.(1) Here, she explores structural injustice in law and its impact on silent stakeholders in subordinate positions, citing examples from Finland.
3D gavel with particles and connections.

Depoliticisation as a silencer in lawmaking

In her thought-provoking commentary, Kati Rantala from the Faculty of Social Sciences delves into the concept of depoliticisation, exploring how it acts as a silencer in lawmaking. She examines the rhetoric surrounding inclusivity and participation in the normative basis for regulatory policy.
Figure: Types of silent stakeholders

Silent stakeholders in regulatory policy

In this first of a four-part series, Kati Rantala from the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Helsinki examines silent stakeholders in regulatory policy – identifying who they are, explaining their significance, and exploring ways to enhance their involvement.
Figure: Elements of RIA

Regulatory impact assessment and policymaking research

Kati Rantala, Research Director at the Faculty of Social Sciences, analyses Regulatory Impact Assessment as a policymaking tool.

Faculty of Social Sciences – University of Helsinki

The SILE project (2021 – 2026) investigates how the position, well-being, and rights of silent stakeholders are taken into account in the preparation and implementation of laws, and what kinds of impacts laws have on their everyday lives.

Follow Us

Advertisements