MEPs urged to reject biofuel law

MEPs urged to reject biofuel law

The National Farmers’ Union is calling for UK MEPs to reject a draft law that will impact the production of biofuels…

A new draft law that would limit the amount of crops involved in biofuel production is set to be presented to the European Parliament at the end of the month. The cap on the amount of crops allowed to be used for biofuel processing would be reduced from 10 to seven per cent if the law is enacted.

The National Farmers’ Union (NFU) is urging UK MEPs to reject the law, which was put forward following extensive debates on Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC). The issue was brought about by the European Council, Parliament, Commission, and the Environment Committee.

The NFU said the new law would expose farmers to market volatility. It would narrow the biofuel market for wheat, oilseed rape, and sugar beet.

The group, which represents farmers and the agriculture sector, also said the food verse fuel argument was not valid, as the stable, reliable, and domestic supply of high-protein animal feed made from biofuel processing was vital for UK livestock producers.

Additionally, the group warned there could be a negative impact on overall grain production and food security if Europe pushes for farmers to produce less.

The debate surrounding ILUC has impacted the level of ambition in Europe to promote biofuels, despite the significant benefits for the environment and the economy.

The NFU’s farmer expert on biofuels Brett Askew said: “Legislators have clearly been bullied into this U-turn by a series of environmental and social pressure groups that, until recently, stood shoulder to shoulder with industry and praised the potential contribution of biofuels in decarbonising the transport sector.

“The biofuel industry has led the way in demonstrating standards on farm in the UK, across Europe and subsequently raising sustainability around the world.

“Yet throughout this process these facts have been ignored with the misleading claim of a conflict between food and fuel distracting policy makers from their original focus: reducing European reliance on harmful fossil fuels in our transport system.

“MEPs have one last chance to demonstrate their commitment to decarbonising the European transport sector while at the same time decreasing the UK and Europe’s protein deficit.

“It is therefore vital that the compromise text is rejected in plenary on the 29th April.”


    Of course farmers’ union want more biofuels: it means higher crop prices for arable farmers, even if livestock farmers suffer.
    How they can also maintain that biofuels have no effect on food consumption is a mystery. The by-products used for animal feed are only a fraction of the crop diverted to biofuel, so that can’t explain it.
    Environmental groups were indeed pro-biofuels…until about 2008, when it became clear that biofuels actually increase greenhouse gas emissions and put up food prices.

    Economists also turned against them when they saw that they are an extraordinarily inefficient way of subsidizing agriculture. The only beneficiaries are such hard-pressed groups as Cargill, ADM and Bunge, who control world crop trading, and landlords benefiting from higher land prices. Everyone else pays in higher fuel prices, higher taxes, slower growth, less employment, higher food prices, higher cost of food aid and more climate change.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here