Researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and their colleagues have proposed a novel method for detecting dark matter
When we spoke to Director of the Helsinki Institute of Physics (HIP), professor Katri Huitu, and the HIP Theory Programme Director, academy professor Kari Rummukainen, we asked them to explain the significance of detecting dark matter. They said:
“Dark matter is among the mysteries of the universe and actively searched for in various ways. It has been known to exist for almost ninety years. It was first noticed that the galaxies should disintegrate fast if they consist only of the known matter. Later its existence is evidenced by, for example, the gravitational lensing effect.
“The Planck satellite mission measured that more than quarter of Universe energy density consists of dark matter. The future EUCLID satellite mission will measure the distribution of dark matter in the universe. It is not known what the dark matter is. It seems probable that it consists of particles, but they cannot be any of the known particles of the Standard Model.”
NIST: The new idea for detecting dark matter
The proposed experiment by NIST, in which a billion millimeter-sized pendulums would act as dark matter sensors, would be the first to hunt for dark matter solely through its gravitational interaction with visible matter. The experiment would be one of the few to search for dark matter particles with a mass as great as that of a grain of salt, a scale rarely explored and never studied by sensors capable of recording tiny gravitational forces.
Previous experiments have sought dark matter by looking for nongravitational signs of interactions between the invisible particles and certain kinds of ordinary matter. That’s been the case for searches for a hypothetical type of dark matter called the WIMP (weakly interacting massive particles), which was a leading candidate for the unseen material for more than two decades. Physicists looked for evidence that when WIMPs occasionally collide with chemical substances in a detector, they emit light or kick out electric charge.
Researchers hunting for WIMPs in this way have either come up empty-handed or garnered inconclusive results; the particles are too light (theorised to range in mass between that of an electron and a proton) to detect through their gravitational tug.
With the search for WIMPs seemingly on its last legs, researchers at NIST and their colleagues are now considering a more direct method to look for dark matter particles that have a heftier mass and therefore wield a gravitational force large enough to be detected.
“Our proposal relies purely on the gravitational coupling, the only coupling we know for sure that exists between dark matter and ordinary luminous matter,” said study co-author Daniel Carney, a theoretical physicist jointly affiliated with NIST, the Joint Quantum Institute (JQI) and the Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science (QuICS) at the University of Maryland in College Park, and the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
‘A billion billion times the mass of a proton’
The researchers, who also include Jacob Taylor of NIST, JQI and QuICS; Sohitri Ghosh of JQI and QuICS; and Gordan Krnjaic of the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, calculate that their method can search for dark matter particles with a minimum mass about half that of a grain of salt, or about a billion billion times the mass of a proton. The scientists report their findings today in Physical Review D.
Because the only unknown in the experiment is the mass of the dark matter particle, not how it couples to ordinary matter, “if someone builds the experiment we suggest, they either find dark matter or rule out all dark matter candidates over a wide range of possible masses,” said Carney. The experiment would be sensitive to particles ranging from about 1/5,000 of a milligram to a few milligrams.
That mass scale is particularly interesting because it covers the so-called Planck mass, a quantity of mass determined solely by three fundamental constants of nature and equivalent to about 1/5,000 of a gram.
What are the two proposals?
Carney, Taylor and their colleagues propose two schemes for their gravitational dark matter experiment. Both involve tiny, millimeter-size mechanical devices acting as exquisitely sensitive gravitational detectors. The sensors would be cooled to temperatures just above absolute zero to minimise heat-related electrical noise and shielded from cosmic rays and other sources of radioactivity. In one scenario, a myriad of highly sensitive pendulums would each deflect slightly in response to the tug of a passing dark matter particle.
Similar devices (with much larger dimensions) have already been employed in the recent Nobel-prize-winning detection of gravitational waves, ripples in the fabric of space-time predicted by Einstein’s theory of gravity. Carefully suspended mirrors, which act like pendulums, move less than the length of an atom in response to a passing gravitational wave.
In another strategy, the researchers propose using spheres levitated by a magnetic field or beads levitated by laser light. In this scheme, the levitation is switched off as the experiment begins, so that the spheres or beads are in free fall. The gravity of a passing dark matter particle would ever so slightly disturb the path of the free-falling objects.
“We are using the motion of objects as our signal,” said Taylor. “This is different from essentially every particle physics detector out there.”
The researchers calculate that an array of about a billion tiny mechanical sensors distributed over a cubic meter is required to differentiate a true dark matter particle from an ordinary particle or spurious random electrical signals or “noise” triggering a false alarm in the sensors. Ordinary subatomic particles such as neutrons (interacting through a nongravitational force) would stop dead in a single detector. In contrast, scientists expect a dark matter particle, whizzing past the array like a miniature asteroid, would gravitationally jiggle every detector in its path, one after the other.
Noise would cause individual detectors to move randomly and independently rather than sequentially, as a dark matter particle would. As a bonus, the coordinated motion of the billion detectors would reveal the direction the dark matter particle was headed as it zoomed through the array.
To fabricate so many tiny sensors, the team suggests that researchers may want to borrow techniques that the smartphone and automotive industries already use to produce large numbers of mechanical detectors.
Thanks to the sensitivity of the individual detectors, researchers employing the technology needn’t confine themselves to the dark side. A smaller-scale version of the same experiment could detect the weak forces from distant seismic waves as well as that from the passage of ordinary subatomic particles, such as neutrinos and single, low-energy photons (particles of light). The smaller-scale experiment could even hunt for dark matter particles — if they impart a large enough kick to the detectors through a nongravitational force, as some models predict, Carney said.
Could this really work?
Director of the Helsinki Institute of Physics (HIP), professor Katri Huitu, and the HIP Theory Programme Director, academy professor Kari Rummukainen, circle us back to why these discoveries are so crucial. Speaking with Open Access Government earlier this year, they said:
“New accelerators with the used techniques tend indeed to be more expensive. Typically building a new accelerator takes a long time, more than 20 years, so that it is a challenge to keep up the expertise in construction of new equipment. Whether the expense is huge depends somewhat on the viewpoint. These are global efforts, and the spending of one nation is proportional to its fair share.
“One can ask, why do we want to detect these new particles? Now, experiments at large accelerators are the only way to extend the understanding of the innermost structure of matter.
“This way we can investigate the fundamental laws of physics and extend the boundaries of human knowledge.”
Editor's Recommended Articles
Must Read >> Can nanoparticles change lung cancer treatment?